1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2001 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Highlander (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 440 kg more than 2001 Toyota Highlander.
Because 2001 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |