1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2002 BMW X5.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2002 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2890 mm |
