1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2380 mm |