1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Panda |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1251 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 63 L |