1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |
