1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 240 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Freelander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 175 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |