1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2004 Mahindra CL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 895 kg more than 2004 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | 62 | CL |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2040 mm |