1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 612 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Cadillac 62 2004 Mercury Sable
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model 62 Sable
Year Released 1960 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2985 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2200 kg 1588 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2870 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 85 L