1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 369 kg more than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1831 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 73 L |
