1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 486 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3516 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
