1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 767 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Ram |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 330 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2962 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |