1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Holden Astra
To start off, 2005 Holden Astra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Holden Astra. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 805 kg more than 2005 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Holden Astra | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Astra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |