1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
