1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 825 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Croma |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2197 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 145 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |
