1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Mazda DrifterX. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda DrifterX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | DrifterX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |