1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Isuzu I-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | 62 | I-350 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |
