1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 215 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Commander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2987 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2790 mm |