1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1020 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 76 L |