1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 205 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Almera |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1597 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
