1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2008 Saab 9-7X is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saab 9-7X (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | 62 | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |