1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | A6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2833 mm |