1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2685 mm |