1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (156 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Cadillac 62 2009 Mazda 3
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model 62 3
Year Released 1960 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2258 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2200 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 55 L