1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 62 | Brera |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |
