1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X5 (350 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X5 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2010 BMW X5 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | X5 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 85 L |