1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (239 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 2 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
Model | 62 | H3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |