1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2010 Lexus RX.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Lexus RX | |
Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
Model | 62 | RX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 73 L |