1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1349 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |