1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |
