1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 860 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | 62 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |