1960 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac Biarritz. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac Biarritz.
Because 1960 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Biarritz | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Biarritz | A6 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
