1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1655 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Brougham | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | Brougham | Tipo 64 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |
