1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 220 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Brougham | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Brougham | 62 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 79 L |
