1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. (591 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Cadillac Brougham.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Brougham | HSV |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 591 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |