1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2004 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (591 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Discovery. (407 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Discovery.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Brougham | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Brougham | Discovery |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 591 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 93 L |