1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 765 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (591 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Brougham | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Brougham | K2700 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 591 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |