1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (591 Nm) has 494 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Brougham | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Brougham | 1400 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 591 Nm | 97 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |