1960 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (591 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | Brougham | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 591 Nm | 232 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |