1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1962 DKW Munga is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 995 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | DeVille | Munga |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 31 L |
