1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 120 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
