1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 1971 Rover 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 840 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | DeVille | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |
