1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Holden Camira

To start off, 1982 Holden Camira is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: