1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1960 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 55 L |