1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1998 Proton 400
To start off, 1998 Proton 400 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1998 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1998 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1109 kg more than 1998 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac DeVille | 1998 Proton 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Proton |
Model | DeVille | 400 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |