1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Kia Rio
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1085 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | DeVille | Rio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2420 mm |
