1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 640 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | DeVille | Condor |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |
