1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1285 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | DeVille | Smart |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2370 mm |
