1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1361 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | DeVille | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1810 mm |
