1960 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 285 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac DeVille | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |