1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1963 Ford Taunus is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Eldorado | Taunus |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 58.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 50 L |
